13. The scales of the two standards are inconsistent and the scoring standards are the same. Can the objective scores be inconsistent?

Answer: Yes. When the two bidding sections (packages) are inconsistent in size and scale, but the scoring standards are the same, each member of the bid evaluation committee will score a supplier in accordance with the bid evaluation methods and standards in the bidding documents. The objective scores should be consistent, and the procurement agency is responsible for reviewing. If any inconsistencies are found, they should be revised on the spot to be consistent. It is okay for the supplier to challenge the purchaser and procurement agency in writing "within 7 working days from the day when they knew or should have known that their rights and interests were harmed".

Legal basis

"Measures for Government Procurement Questions and Complaints" (Order No. 94 of the Ministry of Finance) Article 10 If a supplier believes that the procurement documents, procurement process, bid winning or transaction result has harmed his rights and interests, he may know or should know that his rights and interests have been harmed. Within 7 working days from the date of registration, the purchaser and the procurement agency shall be challenged in writing.

14. Can the challenged supplier require the challenged bidder to provide a list of goods and products?

For government procurement of goods, there are many product details, and the announcement result does not publish the product details. Can the unsuccessful bidder question the product of the winning bidder that does not meet the requirements of the bidding documents, and let the winning bidder provide the list of goods and products?

Answer: The purchaser or procurement agency should be the object of the questioning, not the winning bidder. In this case, the unsuccessful bidder questioned the bidding supplier’s products that did not meet the requirements of the bidding documents, essentially questioning the procurement process and the results of the procurement. . The purchaser or purchasing agency should accept it. The reply to the challenged supplier shall be the responsibility of the purchaser or procurement agency rather than the successful bidder. Therefore, the challenged supplier does not have the right to allow the successful bidder to provide a list of goods and products. The list of goods and products should generally be announced in the announcement of the winning bid. The content should include the project name and project number, the name, address and amount of the winning bidder, the name, specification and model, quantity, unit price, service requirements, etc. of the main winning bidder. The announcement of the winning bid result fails to comply with Article 69 of the "Administrative Measures for Government Procurement of Goods and Services Bidding and Bidding" (Ministry of Finance Order No. 87). The purchaser and procurement agency shall be responsible and shall be corrected.

Legal basis

"Administrative Measures for Government Procurement of Goods and Services in Bidding and Bidding" (Order No. 87 of the Ministry of Finance) Article 69 The content of the announcement of the winning bid shall include the name, address, contact information, project name and The project number, the name, address and amount of the winning bidder, the name, specification, quantity, unit price, service requirements of the main winning bidder, the deadline for the announcement of the winning bid, and the list of review experts.